The Private Diary of Adam Nagourney

4/1/2006

It’s April fools- duh!

Filed under: — Adam @ 8:01 pm

what up hags!
More proof that liberals have no sense of humor:( That ullltra liberal, in your face, Americablog guy fell for my April fools joke. I mean hello? I worte that piece almost 18 months ago. The fucked up thing is I handed it in to the Times and they fell for it too. Eww. I hope I don’t get in trouble like Judy.

The funny thing is, this:

Bloggers, for all the benefits they might bring to both parties, have proved to be a complicating political influence for Democrats. They have tugged the party consistently to the left, particularly on issues like the war, and have been openly critical of such moderate Democrats as Senator Joseph I. Lieberman of Connecticut.

Was the only thing I was serious about.

I mean, a. leftists are against the Iraq war. b. when you have two people running in a primary is it not more complicated than having only one person running? Answer, it is less complicated. NOT. It is mathematically proven that it is twice as complicated. TAKE A MATH COURSE, AMERICASBLOG! d. How can Lieberman be considered “conservative” like Americasblog says when Joe Lieberman is, in FACT, Jewish? e. Right wing blogs don’t complicate things for Republicans- they help Republicans- because they are not liberal. If Right blogs were liberal, then, of course they would complicate things for Republicans because Republicans are moderate and for the war! f. who the frig is Ben Domech?- like I care, queenbiaaatch!

What AMERICASBLOG does not get is that I am liberal. But I HELP the Democrats by not writing liberal things, that way they are not complicated. I tell them what they are doing wrong, I have no agenda about them, I am just making sure I do well, which is less complicated for Democrats. If you cared more about yourself you would not right liberal stuff and get a real job. GET IT! Have you been on Charlie Rose? What? Oh, you said no. Cause I have! What is more interesting to Charlie Rose? Republican bloggers are racist and plagerize or things are complicated? I love howbloggers like to talk about nuance and then when I write about nuance they get all pissy. AND IT WAS AN APRIL FOOLS JOKE!

That is why when I see blogs…. I hit DELETE!

p.s. I saw that greek guy Atrios on the West Wing—-uh, not cool at all, Total GEEK! HA HA! :)

99 Comments »

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://www.adamnagourney.com/wp-trackback.php/55

  1. what does this post mean? is it in English? is it a bad translation? is it supposed to be funny?

    Comment by sockmonkey — 4/1/2006 @ 8:08 pm

  2. This is a private blog and you have no business posting here. You are not an AD HAG so go away!

    Jodi- if you are there.. how do I keep the blog private again? It keeps going public. Is there a button thingy?

    Comment by ADNags — 4/1/2006 @ 8:12 pm

  3. Nags, you are so clever. And shrewd. And cool! You really duped those nasty leftwing blogbitches. Who do they think they are anyway? We’re reporters. I mean just because George jokes with me at a press conference doesn’t mean I’m always going to tilt the story his way. I have a reputation to maintain. Just ask Russert. Anyway, it’s the appearance of impartiality that counts. Like my book on Condi, it’s going to have lots of footnotes. Anyway I gotta get going. My Commodore 64 needs a rest. Love ya babe!

    Comment by Elisabeth Bumiller — 4/1/2006 @ 9:19 pm

  4. Nags, you’re a mensch! Once I’m in Rummy’s chair, you’ve got all the inside dish.

    Comment by Joe Lieberman — 4/1/2006 @ 10:35 pm

  5. You must be good typing with one hand, ‘cause the other one’s workin’ Lieberman’s joint pretty hard.

    Comment by Ghost of Roger Grimsby — 4/1/2006 @ 10:53 pm

  6. Sen. Leiberman will be rewarded by history for taking on the internet the way he took on popular music. You need to tell this story, Adam. Maybe even write a book – Sen Leiberman needs your words as he is history.

    Comment by Joe2008! — 4/2/2006 @ 1:13 am

  7. Drinks at that place you like on Tues? A teensy bit of super, super (to infinity!) off-record work but mostly hot hot times.

    Comment by Ken M — 4/2/2006 @ 10:10 am

  8. What an incoherent spewing of words. Who the hell reads this crap??

    Comment by cosmo — 4/2/2006 @ 11:30 am

  9. Adam,
    Way to set them straight.

    How many times do we need to point out to those whiny liberal bloggers that they don’t really matter?

    If they did, I’d see them at Chris Matthews’ place on Nantucket.

    Or those nice dinner parties at Condi’s townhouse.

    -D

    Comment by Danny Okrent — 4/2/2006 @ 11:30 am

  10. This has to be a joke. Nobody is that stupid, except Bush.

    Comment by Buzz K. — 4/2/2006 @ 11:41 am

  11. Ad,

    Where do I sign up to be an Ad Hag?

    Comment by JillK. — 4/2/2006 @ 12:01 pm

  12. You tell ‘em, Adam! I wish we had more of your kind at the Post. I’m so sick of that motherfucker Froomkin. Let me know if you ever want to make a move – I’d be delighted to put in a good word for you.

    Comment by Deborah Howell — 4/2/2006 @ 12:02 pm

  13. Nags, way to put the SMACKDOWN on the bitter burned out old hippies. What a joke. They should go back to Cambridge where at least they’ll be happy.

    Comment by Hag79 — 4/2/2006 @ 12:05 pm

  14. Nagourney, don’t you ever bring up my fucking name again, got it? All it takes is one call to Punch and I’ll have you on the obituary desk like THAT! DON’T YOU FUCK WITH ME, I’M THE QUEEN OF ALL FUCKING IRAQ!!!!

    Comment by Judith Miller — 4/2/2006 @ 12:08 pm

  15. All your comments are made with such conviction that I have no reason to doubt them, Adam. They FEEL so true. Bravo, sir!

    Just watch out for the bears.

    Comment by Stephen Colbert — 4/2/2006 @ 12:16 pm

  16. All you stupid fucks make me sick. And I’m not shrill.

    -

    Comment by Paul Krugman — 4/2/2006 @ 12:28 pm

  17. Uh, I like toast.

    Comment by Dubya — 4/2/2006 @ 12:42 pm

  18. Are too, Paul.

    Comment by David Brooks — 4/2/2006 @ 12:43 pm

  19. Adam, excellent article on those moonbat leftist bloggers. Who the hell do they think they are to question what we do and who we serve. They can go fuck themselves.

    But listen, I need your help. I have been searching for over a week for a social conservative blogger to replace Domenech and can’t find a single one worthy of consideration that is not a seething bigot and racist. Am I setting my standards too high? Any ideas? I’m getting a bit desperate…

    Thanks!

    Comment by Jim Brady — 4/2/2006 @ 12:47 pm

  20. NYT. What a bunch of rank amateurs. NOBODY takes stenography like me.

    I AM THE QUEEN OF ALL STENOGRAPHY. (take THAT JM)

    Oh yeah, you missed c. you stupid shit Nag……….

    Comment by Susan Schmidt — 4/2/2006 @ 12:48 pm

  21. Look, its April 2nd so this post can’t be an April fools joke because that wouldn’t make sense. But if this is supposed to be serious it is at least as sad as yesterdays pathetic attempt. What IS your major malfunction?

    Comment by USMC — 4/2/2006 @ 12:48 pm

  22. I don’t mind being called liberal as long as I get to eventually tell the world which reporters are total whores in an Op-Ed column.

    Comment by Maureen Dowd — 4/2/2006 @ 1:17 pm

  23. 1. Americablog was spelled wrong twice.
    2. That was an actor on West Wing and not the real Atrios.
    3. Tell your parents to get their money back from what school they sent you to. A 7th grader writes better then this mess.

    Comment by Anonymous — 4/2/2006 @ 1:27 pm

  24. Adam Nagourney is a liberal like I’m Betty Crocker

    Adam is scared, like lots of mainstream reporters who feel blogs on their heels. That’s why he writes shitty things about blogs. Then again, there is better thinking and discussion on blogs than in newspapers.

    I wouldn’t want to be a reporter these days.

    Adam your job could be done by anyone. Only anyone would do a better job.

    J Maccabee

    Comment by Maccabee — 4/2/2006 @ 1:29 pm

  25. Lieberman is the only dem Senator I have any respect for. Pajamas Video (new) may present exclusive video with Lieberman, talking about the Soros-funded extreme leftist Lamont, and how moderated dems like him must prevail. 19 m today, light breezes. The Kliendorfmatic is very smooth, I only had to urinate on the chain once after the long climb up Reagan’s Peak in Palos Verdes. Heh.

    Comment by Charles Johnson — 4/2/2006 @ 1:37 pm

  26. This is hilarious. Absolutely hilarious.

    Comment by tinfoil hattie — 4/2/2006 @ 1:42 pm

  27. What the hell are you babbling about? This piece is an incoherent mess. Does this joker really write for the NY Times?

    Comment by tristan — 4/2/2006 @ 2:01 pm

  28. Not funny.

    And, why doesn’t Alec Baldwin love me?

    Comment by Matt Drudge — 4/2/2006 @ 2:04 pm

  29. I see Queen Judy’s once again having delusions of grandeur. Punch doesn’t take her calls anymore, not since Keller tossed her out on her ass. I know all this, of course, because Punch takes MY calls.

    You believe me, don’t you?

    Comment by Jayson Blair — 4/2/2006 @ 2:05 pm

  30. Whew! Saved. Started to be interesting there for a minute and I thought I was going to have to read the whole thing, then he got to Jews aren’t conservative and I knew I was reading another dust brain on the right. No need to bookmark this one.
    MH

    Comment by Michael Hankin — 4/2/2006 @ 2:07 pm

  31. Good God but this is some funny shit!!

    Comment by Magnum — 4/2/2006 @ 2:22 pm

  32. What the hell is this mess? Did some third-grader barf up his alphabet soup and then transcribe it into a blog? Whoever you are, “Adam", you need some remedial English courses, some manners, and head-deflation surgery before you accidentally break your mom’s favorite Hummels on your way to the kitchen. YIKES.

    Comment by willers — 4/2/2006 @ 2:25 pm

  33. How can Lieberman be considered “conservative” like Americasblog says when Joe Lieberman is, in FACT, Jewish?
    ****
    So no jews are conservative? Are you retarded??? Nevermind I already know that answer to that question.

    Comment by DKarma — 4/2/2006 @ 2:25 pm

  34. I truly, sincerely hope this is some kind of joke.

    Comment by Onomasticator — 4/2/2006 @ 2:26 pm

  35. How is anyone supposed to know that what you wrote was a joke? If it’s OK to write fiction and print it in a mainstream newspaper on ANY day, then what was the point of the NY Times’ firing of Jayson Blair or the Washington Post’s firing of Janet Cooke?

    Comment by Angela — 4/2/2006 @ 2:27 pm

  36. I had no idea so many morons would wind up visiting this site and leaving comments here when my brother linked to it from his blog. Too funny!

    Comment by Antrios — 4/2/2006 @ 2:28 pm

  37. Was that total Geek or total Greek.
    Not bad on either front.
    Sooo much better than a townie so full of himself and
    sucking up to a white house so full of whatever.

    Comment by aibonitobabe — 4/2/2006 @ 2:30 pm

  38. I see Queen Judy’s once again having delusions of grandeur. Punch doesn’t take her calls anymore, not since Keller tossed her out on her ass. I know all this, of course, because Punch takes MY calls.

    You believe me, don’t you?

    Comment by Ben Domenech — 4/2/2006 @ 2:31 pm

  39. the funniest comments are those by people pretending not to get the joke

    Comment by Anonymous — 4/2/2006 @ 2:32 pm

  40. spell correctly much pea-brain? ever learn to use a dictionary or thesaurus?

    much better blog here

    Comment by hypocrites – fuck you right wing nuts — 4/2/2006 @ 2:34 pm

  41. Bendo, you’re learning from the master. Now, repeat after me: It was the best of times, it was the blurst of times….

    Comment by Jayson Blair — 4/2/2006 @ 2:34 pm

  42. You should explore the “Are you retarded” angle furhter…

    Comment by thepoetryman — 4/2/2006 @ 2:41 pm

  43. Jayson,

    Do you know that I would rather write for a Magazine for $2 a page than for a newspaper at $10? I would. One takes more pains, the “truck” looks nicer in print, & one has a pleasanter audience. It is the difference between lecturing in “the States” & doing the same thing in delectable Nevada.

    Wouldn’t you agree?

    Comment by Ben Domenech — 4/2/2006 @ 2:41 pm

  44. Or “further"…

    Comment by thepoetryman — 4/2/2006 @ 2:43 pm

  45. Jeez, Adam, these commenters own you from stem to stern. This can’t be helping your image. If I were you I’d dump the blog and cut my losses. Print is probably much safer since your readers can’t immediately tear your weaker works to ribbons, that you know of.

    Comment by Helpful Truth — 4/2/2006 @ 2:55 pm

  46. That was just an actor playing Atrios, that wasn’t really him.

    Comment by West Wing Geek — 4/2/2006 @ 3:00 pm

  47. If this is a “private blog,” why is it not password protected or comments open to only certain users.

    Comment by Matt O. — 4/2/2006 @ 3:10 pm

  48. I hope you have a page on MySpace … your spelling and syntax would not be out of place there.

    Comment by MC Haiku — 4/2/2006 @ 3:13 pm

  49. Man, sorry Nags. I send a couple of people over for a visit - and they definitely seem humor-impaired today. I just wanted to expand horizons.

    My bad. Kisses to your “girlfriend” - come visit next time you’re in DC.

    P.S. You should see what the bastards say about me when attend fancy tuxedo-clad galas!

    P.P.S. Katherine Harris says hi!

    XXOXXXO

    Comment by John Aravosis — 4/2/2006 @ 3:18 pm

  50. If Lieberman is a moderate democrat would someone please tell me who a conservative one might be?

    Comment by Wondercrab — 4/2/2006 @ 3:22 pm

  51. Aravosis is right - you are obviously a complete douche bag!

    Comment by Bamage — 4/2/2006 @ 3:30 pm

  52. Hey Nags,

    Did you see me give it to McCain today? Yeah, beeatch - bet Mr. Straight-Talk didn’t see that coming. Let’s see Charlie Rose do that!

    Comment by Timmah — 4/2/2006 @ 3:33 pm

  53. Fuck your “private” blog. If you are going to insult people, people have the right to respond. If you don’t like comments, just go like Faux news and have just a website. A blog is interactive, and not just the brainwashed wingnuts have the ability to post. You should be kissing John’s feet, since had you not wrote about him, you wouldn’t even have anybody on this lame ass blog!

    I can’t believe how generic this piece of crap looks, like a Value Box of Corn Flakes. ADAM NAGOURNEY- Biggest. Douchebag. Ever.

    Comment by Liberal Elite — 4/2/2006 @ 3:49 pm

  54. Huh? Lieberman can’t be conservative because he’s Jewish? Ever heard of a guy named Abramoff?

    Comment by JoeW — 4/2/2006 @ 3:50 pm

  55. You can’t be serious. This post is your idea of a joke? One word of advice: Therapy.

    Comment by Reed — 4/2/2006 @ 3:51 pm

  56. ummm…jews can’t be conservative. Like Wolfowitz and most newocons you mean?

    Comment by ImAJew — 4/2/2006 @ 3:56 pm

  57. you say: “How can Lieberman be considered “conservative” like Americasblog says when Joe Lieberman is, in FACT, Jewish?”

    what?

    THAT IS ANTI-SEMETISM.

    Racist assumption, when in fact any true comprehension of American and Israeli politics, points to the true diversity of Jewish people. This is insensitive and dangerously prejudiced, if not ignorant, or, worse, deliberately deceiptful. Watch it!

    Then you say: “…such moderate Democrats as Senator Joseph I. Lieberman of Connecticut.
    Was the only thing I was serious about.”

    so, you were “serious” in writing that? Lieberman a “moderate” Democrat? Who then is a conservative Democrat? This is beyond ignorance, this is semantically spun misinformation. What is your agenda?

    You scholarship is obviously lacking, the fact that you write for the Times is a sad affirmation of their overall decline.

    We are watching you!
    ————————————————————-

    Comment by An Other Greek — 4/2/2006 @ 3:59 pm

  58. On the interwebz, no one can see the evil grin on your face as you write a satirical blog post.

    Comment by renato — 4/2/2006 @ 4:02 pm

  59. Lieberman and Wolfowitz are not neocons. They’re Jewocons.

    But what does it matter - they’re still going to hell.

    Booyah, beeatch.

    Comment by Pat Robertson — 4/2/2006 @ 4:04 pm

  60. Your hateful posting speaks for itself… Nagourney - racist pig embodied!

    Comment by You RACIST PIG — 4/2/2006 @ 4:05 pm

  61. Is this blog writtern by a 12 year old??

    Comment by Clue — 4/2/2006 @ 4:05 pm

  62. Somebody needs to give Adam his meds. NOW!!

    Comment by Clue — 4/2/2006 @ 4:07 pm

  63. Any chance you could learn a little something about spelling and proper grammar before you continue blogging? Or common sense if nothing else?

    Comment by Rudy — 4/2/2006 @ 4:16 pm

  64. Nags,

    Don’t pay attention to these negative and out-of-touch posters - these Americaspajamlinebloggers or whatever they are.

    We’re clearly past the day when, even if we wanted to, we could do all of our work behind a kind of cloak of mystique. I know there are a lot of people in our business who feel nostalgic for the days when you weren’t called upon to justify your reporting methods or defend a line of reporting, but we are past that. I do think it’s important for us, and it’s good for us, more than that. It’s not just an obligation; it’s a healthy thing to let readers know how much work we put into things to get them right and to get them fair.

    Keep up the good blog work Nags. Don’t listen to those know-nothing bloggers.

    Comment by Bill Keller — 4/2/2006 @ 4:26 pm

  65. If this is a joke/parody it’s a VERY bad one.
    If this is serious, you are a fool.
    These options are not mutually exclusive.

    Comment by Lynx — 4/2/2006 @ 4:27 pm

  66. Nags, you left your undies at my condo this morning and you are not answering your cel phone. Please advise: (1) bleach or no bleach, (2) location next meeting.

    Comment by Condi — 4/2/2006 @ 4:34 pm

  67. Wow, Nags, you’ve got these liberals all confused. HA! Give me a call when you want to get together for a night of chardonnay and pretending to be tough guys while we watch my tape of Dubya flying that plane on to the aircraft carrier over and over. The G-Man might even be free that night too.

    And can you believe someone tried to convince me that Dubya isn’t popular anymore. No way someone that hot and masculine and good looking isn’t popular. HA!

    Comment by Chris Matthews — 4/2/2006 @ 4:34 pm

  68. Damn blogger spamer whatevers!

    I am with you Nag!

    I don’t really understand anything you write, (not that I read it), but I believe in protecting our own.

    You are our “Chief Political Correspondent” and you do us proud!

    Screw all them peasants that demand accountability and “quality” journalism!

    Who are they? What have they had to do to get where they got?

    F’ them all, they matter not.

    .
    .
    .

    Comment by Judy you-know-whosy — 4/2/2006 @ 4:35 pm

  69. Ad Nags… breakfast in the Oval Office with the gang @ 8am tomorrow. Dick is bringing some of the proof about Iraq’s WMDs! But remember: the secret club breakfasts are all OFF-THE-RECORD. Make sure to bring the massage oil.

    Comment by Karl Rove — 4/2/2006 @ 4:38 pm

  70. boogersnots

    Comment by Anonymous — 4/2/2006 @ 4:42 pm

  71. Sorry about stupid comment #70. I thought the comments were fake and was just testing.

    Comment by boogersnots — 4/2/2006 @ 4:45 pm

  72. Nags, speaking from personal experience, you might want to be a little more sober when you defend your own oped pieces.

    Comment by Patriot — 4/2/2006 @ 5:00 pm

  73. I just went back and read all the articles you’ve ever written, and I have to retract my above comments.

    I have now seen the light of your brilliance. Not dim at all! I understand the depth of your commitment. Your view is not shallow, it’s seminal, not slimy or self-pleasing.
    ———————————————

    Comment by An Other Greek — 4/2/2006 @ 5:01 pm

  74. Wow, very elite media.

    Comment by ++++++ — 4/2/2006 @ 5:07 pm

  75. Indeed.

    Comment by Prof. Reynolds — 4/2/2006 @ 5:33 pm

  76. This is a parody site – right? Like that one proposedly by Mel Gibson… On behalf of Adam Nagourney, I say CEASE and DESIST. You are ruining this man’s reputation.

    By the way, what led to Caesar’s downfall?

    Comment by gaymafioso — 4/2/2006 @ 5:40 pm

  77. Ad

    My man! Why don’t you join me and Rush in putting these liberals in place. You sure know how to do it well.

    Private message - What do you look like? Since Rush lost the weight he won’t do the “Squeal like a pig” act that I love so much. Since all us conservative writers like taking it in the ass I offer you an intro into the club

    Comment by Sean Hannity — 4/2/2006 @ 5:41 pm

  78. You and me would make a good team Nags. Get my number from Mehlman.

    Comment by Jeff Gannon — 4/2/2006 @ 5:46 pm

  79. It’s so typical that the liberals didn’t notice that your column was an April Fools Joke. Just like the ones you did back in ‘03 supporting the war in Iraq. Jokes on us, I guess, huh?

    “Ad Nags". Perfect.

    Comment by PopeRatzo — 4/2/2006 @ 5:49 pm

  80. Nags…..are you okay? Want me to come over?

    Comment by Elisabeth Bumiller — 4/2/2006 @ 5:58 pm

  81. Nags, you are either irony impaired or humor impaired, I can’t tell which just yet. One thing that is apparent however, your “command” of the english language is almost as good as, well, George W. Chimp’s.

    Comment by MargaretPOA — 4/2/2006 @ 6:01 pm

  82. Fucking right-wing NUTJOBS! Go fight YOUR war, pussy’s!

    Comment by Bushbendsover — 4/2/2006 @ 6:07 pm

  83. I apologize for MargaretPOA. What do you expect from a Pissed Off Artist? Not a sense of humor, apparently.

    You can tell she must paint - because she definitely isn’t writing poetry.

    Anyway, Nagman, let’s go to Amsterdam or Paris. We’ll take pictures of ourselves in tuxedos and laugh at these non-traveling pajamclad no-humor bloggers.

    Kisses.

    Comment by John Aravosis — 4/2/2006 @ 6:14 pm

  84. Just talked to you know who. He wants me to let you know he said, “Heckuva job, Naggie". Jeff G. is over now. Want to join us? It would be lots of fun .

    Comment by Ken M. — 4/2/2006 @ 7:02 pm

  85. Hi. This is William Rehnquist. They buried me alive.
    I have Wi-Fi, but no oxygen.

    Comment by William Rehnquist — 4/2/2006 @ 8:19 pm

  86. Man, I came here from americablog. I am a regular subsciber to the sunday times, but I have to say that after reading your blog, I might have to reconsider my subscription- let’s just say, you are not helping yourself by putting this out there for people to read- it’s not funny if that was your intention, and your grammar and spelling is in desparate need of correction

    Comment by jeff — 4/2/2006 @ 9:49 pm

  87. You are like one of those demonic conservatives….

    Comment by Anonymous — 4/2/2006 @ 11:02 pm

  88. Sigh…

    Another right-wingnut bloviating about how much presidential c0ck he sucks…

    Comment by Iconoplastic — 4/2/2006 @ 11:10 pm

  89. These comments are great. 85, 86, 87, 14, 15, 20, 42, 46, 49, 67, etc, etc. Pretty much all are masterpieces of sarcasm and/or total stupidity.

    My only question is: who the fuck is Adam Nagourney?

    But anyway, back to the point: Liberals have no sense of humor! Conservatives have the sense of humor. Like. Um. Uh. Jeff Foxworthy. Oh, wait, he’s not funny. Anyway, the Liberals have Gallagher. Eat that, biatch!

    Comment by JT — 4/2/2006 @ 11:22 pm

  90. Nags. You are the dumbest motherfucker I have ever crossed paths with, and I followed Alan Keyes’ campaign really closely. You have no grasp of rudimentary punctuation in the English language. You don’t make a lick of sense. You make me wish I could shit on your keyboard so that you don’t use it EVER again. Please stop doing anything related to the public because after reading your turd-rant, it has become my belief that you are single handedly responsible for the intellectual downfall of America.

    Thank you and may your mind be as irregular as your bowel movements.

    Comment by Anonymous — 4/3/2006 @ 12:53 am

  91. AND ABRAMOFF IS A JEW LIKE LIEBERMAN!!! THAT MAKES HIM LIBERAL TOO?!?!? THINK BEFORE YOU SPEAK YOU SOGGY SONOFABITCH!!! GO FUCK A CAMEL.

    yadaya bowel movements

    Comment by Anonymous — 4/3/2006 @ 12:56 am

  92. Will someone actually tell me what you Americans class as “a liberal"? Seems like everyones gets called a liberal at least once in their lives, no matter how far they dress to the Right.

    Comment by Paul — 4/3/2006 @ 1:26 am

  93. Adam. I still can’t get the “Grammar Checker” function to work on the new laptop computer they gave me. Can you call me and tell me again how that works? I forgot to bring the instructions you wrote for me. Also, what does it mean in the manual when they say “control-F1?” I’m so confused by these new technologies. Oh, and does June 11-13 work for you for the Hamptons weekend?

    Bill

    Comment by Bill Keller — 4/3/2006 @ 6:25 am

  94. You are a fuckin idiot

    Comment by Fiona — 4/3/2006 @ 10:02 am

  95. Adam, have you really, been on Charlie Rose!?!? That’s so, kewl. I’d love to do, that… no, you know what I’d, really like to do? Go on Actor’s, Studio!! That’s be so great telling that theatre guy, how I do Deep Voice for important, stuff and Sad Voice when somebody dies and, Isn’t This Awful voice when we’re doing murder, gossip and Isn’t This Great voice when we’re, doing the rest of the gossip. But the big boss, meanies will never let me do that, they still want us to pretend, we’re serious.

    Oh, well, see you at, the next sleep-over… {{{HUGS!}}}

    Comment by Anonymous — 4/3/2006 @ 2:13 pm

  96. Ha ha, forgot to sign, my comment! You knew who it, was right, Nags?

    Comment by Wolf B. — 4/3/2006 @ 2:15 pm

  97. Do you really write for a living? I stopped counting the spelling and grammatical errors in your silly little 7th grade entry. They gave me a headache. Additionally, if you’re going to mention AMERICAblog, the least you can do is have enough respect to get the name right so you don’t look like a moron. In any case, I don’t think you’re a liberal. More like a chickenshit who has no real opinion because you’re too scared of what everyone else will think of you and your real opinions (meaning everyone will find out you’re really a dumbass moron who lost the 3rd grade spelling bee). Get a life, and get a real opinion that you can stand behind. STOP BEING AFRAID. It’s what Bush wants…

    Comment by beauboi — 4/3/2006 @ 11:10 pm

  98. YAY?

    Bono is Brian Peppers!
    Cant play Quake 3

    Comment by Emily — 4/5/2006 @ 7:08 am

  99. cool blog
    ‘Wednesday 05th of April 2006 11:06:40 AM

    Comment by loans — 4/5/2006 @ 1:14 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title="" rel=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>



Welcome to my personal diary! This blog is intended to be written for a PRIVATE audience. If you email me and ask for permissions I may give it to you, but not likely.